> Hal wrote: > > John and I worked on this, but couldn't get performance > times below that of a cfmodule call. I'll have to look > at Patrick's work to see if he cracked that particular > nut. Patrick, am I understanding what you did correctly? No, I haven't looked at a way to improve performance yet. So far, my work has focused on solving problems without touching the core file. Lee does a good job of outlining the motivation for cf_call.
| Lee wrote: | | As Patrick has noted, he has been using his own <CF_Call> | tag to make recursive calls as simple as possible for | some time now, although that still leaves the calls in | their own seperate variable-space, and still entails the | execution overhead of any recursive call. I think. Is | that right, McE? Patrick might well argue that the calls | having their own variable-space is an excellent thing, and | indeed that is often a good idea, a little more short-term | hassle traded for a good deal of longer-term predictability. Patrick ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
