> Hey Ben that's interesting...would like to see what u come > up with.
You want to see my custom framework? Hmmm...that may take a little time. I used to document it pretty well and keep a handle on the SQL Scripts because I planned to make the framework available to everyone. However, as the Fusebox standard started solving some of the problems so I eventually came to the conclusion that my code would be of little interest. Well, that and I got lazy. :) I'll see if I can post some things. Though it will probably make sense to a Fuseboxer, it wouldn't hurt to have an example application. We'll see. :) Benjamin S. Rogers http://www.c4.net/ v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 -----Original Message----- From: Benjamin S. Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SuperQ functionality with the STANDARD core (Re: MVCquestion) > Don't you understand... that if you don't want to move the > standard to MX then you are dedicating resources to develop an > alternate way of doing what MX is ready to do... hmmm... maybe I > am wrong... but it seems like that is the case. <plug type="Shameless"> That was actually one of the main points of an article I wrote just the other day. You may find my experiences interesting. http://www.fulgen.com/content/developerscorner1.cfm </plug> Benjamin S. Rogers http://www.c4.net/ v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
