Steve, I converted my own app framework, which differs quite a bit from Fusebox in the layout department. However, I don't see any reason why the fusebox method can't be converted. I do think the Fusebox
I was going to try converting one of the sample layout apps on the Fusebox site but ColdFusion MX seems to be having some difficulty with some of the templates. After a bit of debugging, I think the problem resides in ColdFusion, not the sample apps. I'm going to work on it a bit more (tonight maybe) and may be posting a bug to the Macromedia forums. I'll let you know if I make any progress. Sorry. Benjamin S. Rogers http://www.c4.net/ v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 -----Original Message----- From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SuperQ functionality with the STANDARD core (Re: MVCquestion) Well that's news to me. I'd be interested in seeing how that works. Steve "Benjamin S. Rogers" wrote: > > > Well it's really going to be a personal preference. Personally for > > me, Fusebox 3 still solves MUCH more than CFCs do. The web services > > in CFCs seem great, but I have only needed a web service 2 times in > > the last year, whereas I've needed nested layouts in EVERY project. > > I actually used CFCs for nesting layouts as well. Though I'm sure it > wasn't exactly what Macromedia intended for CFCs, it works very well. > Actually, now that I think about, I'm not sure the Allaire programmer > that wrote the CFInclude tag intended for Fusebox either. :) > > Benjamin S. Rogers > http://www.c4.net/ > v.508.240.0051 > f.508.240.0057 > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
