an even easier solution is to just use FB's built-in "fusebox.IsCustomTag", if FALSE then cfinclude a file with all your UDF's in it, if TRUE, then don't bother since they are already loaded
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stacy Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:50 PM Subject: RE: Benbox was: Re: SuperQ functionality with the STANDARD core (Re: MVCques > > Right, worst case I've just ported those over to cffunctions for the time > being. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Quarto-vonTivadar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Benbox was: Re: SuperQ functionality with the STANDARD core (Re: > MVCquestion) > > so far I haven't heard anyone mention any problems with running their FB3 > compliant code on CFMX > > However, there might be a problem if you use any UDF's, at least with regard > to CFMX. It seems that if you define your UDFs in one spot and then > CFMODULE a fuseaction that you will get one of those "same UDF defined in > more than one place " errors (which suggests that UDFs have a request > scope????) . I haven't had a huge amount of time to confirm this fully but > I've seen at least once instance where it occured, and the same code worked > fine in CF5. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Benjamin S. Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:40 PM > Subject: RE: SuperQ functionality with the STANDARD core (Re: MVCquestion) > > > > Steve, > > > > I converted my own app framework, which differs quite a bit from Fusebox > > in the layout department. However, I don't see any reason why the > > fusebox method can't be converted. I do think the Fusebox > > > > I was going to try converting one of the sample layout apps on the > > Fusebox site but ColdFusion MX seems to be having some difficulty with > > some of the templates. After a bit of debugging, I think the problem > > resides in ColdFusion, not the sample apps. I'm going to work on it a > > bit more (tonight maybe) and may be posting a bug to the Macromedia > > forums. > > > > I'll let you know if I make any progress. Sorry. > > > > Benjamin S. Rogers > > http://www.c4.net/ > > v.508.240.0051 > > f.508.240.0057 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:33 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: SuperQ functionality with the STANDARD core (Re: > > MVCquestion) > > > > > > Well that's news to me. I'd be interested in seeing how that works. > > > > Steve > > > > "Benjamin S. Rogers" wrote: > > > > > > > Well it's really going to be a personal preference. Personally for > > > > me, Fusebox 3 still solves MUCH more than CFCs do. The web services > > > > in CFCs seem great, but I have only needed a web service 2 times in > > > > the last year, whereas I've needed nested layouts in EVERY project. > > > > > > I actually used CFCs for nesting layouts as well. Though I'm sure it > > > wasn't exactly what Macromedia intended for CFCs, it works very well. > > > Actually, now that I think about, I'm not sure the Allaire programmer > > > that wrote the CFInclude tag intended for Fusebox either. :) > > > > > > Benjamin S. Rogers > > > http://www.c4.net/ > > > v.508.240.0051 > > > f.508.240.0057 > > > > > > > > > > > > > AVIS IMPORTANT: > ------------------------------- > Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses pieces jointes sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a l'usage de la (des) personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire, soyez avise que toute divulgation, distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de ces informations est strictement prohibee. Si vous avez recu ce document par erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous quelque forme. > > WARNING: > ------------------------------- > The information contained in this document and attachments is confidential and intended only for the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any other use of the information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this document and attachments without making any copy of any kind. > > > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
