> is there any reason why the attributes "scoped" variables are defined as > straight "<CFSET attribute.<var>" (well..using setVariable, but you get > my meaning) as opposed to in an "attribute" struct like FORM and URL > scoped variables?
Attributes scope was made available as a structure in CF4.5 SPsomething I believe. Code before that had to use attributes.foo or SetVariable() instead of attributes["foo"]. > I'm just curious why the break from the apparent standardized approach that > MM took regarding scopes. Now all the scopes are indeed structures (in CFMX), but in earlier CF versions some were not. That's why. > ... but my computer is currently not liking pdf files (locks up), > and i don't have word installed. :) OT, but for this there are free "viewers" available at MS Office site: http://makeashorterlink.com/?A1B252A01 .erki ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
