Hi. Luis Cañas-Díaz <[email protected]> writes:
> Hey guys, > I'm not sure if you are familiar with the kind of studies/reports we are > performing in our spin-off named Bitergia. [1][2] > > We've just published a report of the history of Fusionforge built with > the information available in the Git repository of FusionForge and the > mailing lists. I hope you find it interesting/useful: > > http://blog.bitergia.com/2012/11/16/the-history-of-fusionforge-and-gforge/ > > In the following weeks we plan to add FusionForge support to the tool > that gathers information from issues (its name is Bicho), so a new > version of the report will be generated with more sources of information > (commits, mails and issues). > > The process to create this kind of report is almost automatic, so you > could reproduce it if you want to[3]. Take into account that this > automatic process doesn't pay attention to important factors that could > affect the final result (unique identities, bots, companies involved, > types of commits, etc ..) > > Any kind of feedback is really appreciated. > Great blog post and report :-) Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France) _______________________________________________ Fusionforge-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fusionforge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusionforge-general
