Congratulations. Regards, Franck aka nerville
Le 24/04/2014 21:15, [email protected] a écrit :
Hi Dionysios, As far as I understand the import/export project is accepted in GSoC 2014! http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2014/nioniosfr/5668600916475904 I would suggest joining the IRC channel #fusionforge on FreeNode so we can prepare :) Cheers! Sylvain On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 03:11:58PM +0100, Dionysios Fryganas wrote:Hello, Sorry for my delayed replies each time, but this week is my exam period. On 25/03/2014 11:12 πμ, [email protected] wrote:Hi, On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 08:20:35PM +0100, Dionysios Fryganas wrote:The problem is that the local repository that is created is empty, thus the "fusionforge-full" and "gforge-db-postgresql" packages cannot be found when trying to install them. This originates from the build script. After running "update.sh", the build script is updated and the error occurs from a command on line 80 (the one below). dch --newversion $(dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -n 's/^Version: \([0-9.]\+\(\~rc[0-9]\)\).*/\1/p')+$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M)-1 --distribution local --force-distribution "Autobuilt." The '+' sign that is intended to append the date to the result of "sed", is getting printed in front of the date output as part of the version number. This generates a warning when running the build script, but the script continues execution, so it's easy to miss it and then, if you run the "install.sh" script it will fail to execute at line 40. My fix was: * run the update script * remove the plus '+' operator from the build script (above command) * then run the build script Was I the only on that had this error? What should I do to let others know about it?I didn't spot it because I was working on the 5.3 branch recently. The fix would rather be making "~rc" optional, which I intended but somehow didn't: -dch --newversion $(dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -n 's/^Version: \([0-9.]\+\(\~rc[0-9]\)\).*/\1/p')+$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M)-1 --distribution local --force-distribution "Autobuilt." +dch --newversion $(dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -n 's/^Version: \([0-9.]\+\(\~rc[0-9]\)\?\).*/\1/p')+$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M)-1 --distribution local --force-distribution "Autobuilt." I'll refresh the branches with the fixes, thanks for the report :)I'm glad that I could help!and I had to include the deb and deb-src sources manually, as stated here:https://fusionforge.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fusionforge/index.php/Installing/DebianRepositories#5.2_Build Except that I have a working development environment and I also played around with it a bit. Good (even though this version is roughly 1y1/2 old). So what do your first feelings with FusionForge?So, love or hate? ;)Definitely love. There are many features in the program that make it stand out of the different solutions I tried in the past. Basically what I liked is the categories that you can define for the projects. It makes it really easy to find what you are looking for. The plugin system is quite impressive as well. It couldn't be any easier to extend the main functionality!The company I had my internship at, offers a service that uses an open-source database called 6PP that holds all the postcode information for Netherlands and Belgium. The database information can be consumed via a REST API, provided by the company. My task was to create a plugin for Joomla and one for Wordpress that would ease the integration of the service for these platforms and allow less technically experienced users to use it with their web stores. I also maintained the plugins that people contributed to the company for different platforms. You can find more details about it here: http://www.pro6pp.nl/demo/autocomplete/demoHmm, just for my information, in what way is an "open-source" database if you need to access it through an API and with an auth key? :/ (also the joomla download link just redirects to the homepage)Ok, I answered this one kinda fast. Indeed it is not open-source, it used to be, but later they created a company around it because of legal issues (as I was told). They do provide an export of the whole database though and all the code they provide for accessing the API is licensed under open-source licenses, by need you may say. About the link, I do not know why is dead. I send them an e-mail for that! Dionysis_______________________________________________ Fusionforge-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fusionforge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusionforge-general
-- TrivialDev Founder http://trivialdev.com
<<attachment: franck_villaume.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Fusionforge-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fusionforge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusionforge-general
