Le Ven 11 janvier 2013 11:49, Guillaume Rousse a écrit : > Le 11/01/2013 11:44, Benoit Mortier a écrit : >>> Second issue: we transmit PCI identifiers (vendor and device) as a >>> single PCIID element, whereas we transmit them as distinct VENDORID and >>> PRODUCTID for the USB device. We should either have PCI controller >>> PCIID >>> element splitted into VENDORID and PRODUCTID too, or USB device >>> PRODUCTID and VENDORID merged to a single USBID element. >> >> i'am in favour of the splitting into VENDORID and PRODUCTID because that >> would allow people from the opsi project to use fusioninventory as the >> inventory tool for windows installation and inventory management > Why would just presenting it differently make a difference ?
because its the first step in the good direction :), i have one or two whislist to enter in the forge for the rest to happen Cheers -- Benoit Mortier CEO OpenSides "logiciels libres pour entreprises" : http://www.opensides.eu/ Promouvoir et défendre le Logiciel Libre http://www.april.org/ Main developper in FusionDirectory : http://www.fusiondirectory.org/ Contributor to OPSI : http://opsi.org/ _______________________________________________ Fusioninventory-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fusioninventory-devel
