From: Saul N. Silverman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>The whole tenor of your argument, your repetition of the same, and the
>kaleidescopic nature of the way in which it is repeated from various
>perspective, using an inventive range of invective metaphor. All
>classical signs of obsessive communication.
I see. So it's your intention to divert attention away from the issues and
convert it into a personal attack on me. Nice tactic, but pretty
transparent Saul.
I have stayed on topic: economists. I clearly explained my logic, I have
cited my sources. Can the economists on this list defend their discipline
against my specific charges? Or are they going to revert to soap opera?
Jay -- www.dieoff.com
