> ICFTU On Line
> 215/981009/ND
> 
> Restructurings at Levi's: trade unions want global discussion 
> 
> Brussels, 13 October 1998 (ICFTU on-line): "Levi Strauss is applying a
> profoundly anti-union strategy.  It announces to the world that it is
> pro-worker, but its real attitude is totally out of sync with the
> quality image it seeks to put across. It was quick to adopt a code of
> conduct committing it to minimum employee relations standards, but this
> has remained a dead letter".  Meeting this week in Berlin, the Executive
> Committee of the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers'
> Federation (ITGLWF), an ICFTU affiliate, denounced the hypocrisies of
> the world's number one jeans manufacturer which on 29 September last
> announced its intention to close four European plants (3 in Belgium and
> one in France) with 1461 workers in all."  After the discussion we have
> just had with the American delegates, we are convinced of the need to
> broaden the discussion to the world level.  A letter was sent this
> Thursday morning to the Levi's head office in which we invite group CEO
> Bob Haas to meet us.  For Patrick Itschert, the Secretary General of the
> European trade union federation for the sector, the explanations that
> Levi's has been putting forward for several months now in order to
> justify the major restructurings (11 plants closed in the United States,
> and two other American units facing the same fate) do not hold water.
> If the brand has lost its appeal among young consumers, the real reason
> is its desire to maximize profits at all costs.  "The Belgian and French
> sites threatened with closure are profitable.  But the group's purported
> over-capacities are due - as if by accident - to growing activities
> outside the European Union.  Levi's is running its business on a
> sub-contracting and joint venture basis.  In Turkey, for example, it has
> signed a contract with an exclusive sub-contractor and a plant has been
> set up.  This plant employed 150 workers in August 1997, a number soon
> to be tripled.  My deep conviction is that this is disguised delocation,
> which has been on the drawing board for a long time".
> 
> Nor, Patrick Itschert continues, does Levi's respect ILO conventions 87,
> 98 and 135 on trade union freedom and the freedom of collective
> bargaining.  "In Hungary, management has prevented workers from setting
> up trade unions.  We fought for two years and, finally, given the size
> of the movement, it had to give way".  These practices will hardly
> surprise American delegates meeting in Berlin this week for the ITGLWF
> Executive Committee.  The federation has therefore decided to step up
> pressure on central group management to respect its commitments (its
> code of conduct) and labour standards.
> 
> As to the fate of the 1461 Belgian and French workers, the Levi's
> European works' council meeting of 5 October ended with the decision to
> give workers' representatives two months in which to come up with
> counter-proposals based on experts' reports.  But the
> unrepresentativeness of this Levi's committee makes the forthcoming
> discussions very problematic and is stoking trade union wrath:
> "Management has manoeuvred cleverly" Patrick Itschert says, "putting the
> trade unionists delegated by European production units representing more
> than 3,000 workers into a minority against a mass of employee
> "representatives" who are in fact commercial unit executives sent by
> Levi's management.  For example,  the Finnish delegate representing 7
> people has as much say as the French delegate speaking for 530 people
> under threat of redundancy at the "La Bassée" plant.  When negotiating
> the setting up of the council, we asked for proportion representation,
> but Levi's said no.
> 
> The directive on European works councils which the European Council of
> Ministers adopted in 1994 is intended to enable workers from so-called
> "Community-sized" enterprises to be better informed and consulted about
> their groups' activities, prospects, structure, economic and financial
> situation and likely development, in short, everything that could affect
> workers.  This legislation applies to enterprises with at least 1,000
> workers in the 18 signatory states, and at least 150 in two or more of
> these countries. Right now, some 450 European works' councils are
> already up and running.  The directive is due for reassessment by
> European social partners in a few months' time.  These works' councils
> can have a major impact on industrial relations and contribute to
> greater transparency in the way multinationals operate.  Information and
> consultation can be no more than stages on the path of negotiation.
> Everything depends on the goodwill of corporate head offices.  As is
> demonstrated by the negative examples of the recent closure of Renault
> Vilvoorde and those announced by Levi's today.
> 
> Contact: ICFTU Press, Tel. 32.2.224.02.12 (Brussels).  For further
> information, please visit our internet site (Http://www.icftu.org).
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to