By the way, Orwell was a socialist, he was bitterly
disappointed with the deformity that happened,
and what socialist wouldn't be?
However, your contribution would be more informative
if it responded to the points I made when listed the valid reasons
for this deformity, and why do you think we would
willingly repeat the same mistakes?
Eva
> What we have is historical evidence that yet another hallucination failed.
>
> Jay
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> "The Party claimed, of course, to have liberated the
> proles from bondage. . . . In reality very little was
> known about the proles. It was not necessary to know
> much. So long as they continued to work and breed,
> their other activities were without importance. Left to
> themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of
> Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that
> appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral
> pattern. They were born, they grew up in the gutters,
> they went to work at twelve, they passed through a brief
> blossoming period of beauty and sexual desire, they
> married at twenty, they were middle-aged at thirty, they
> died, for the most part, at sixty. Heavy physical work,
> the care of home and children, petty quarrels with
> neighbors, films, football, beer, and, above all,
> gambling filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep
> them in control was not difficult."
> -- George Orwell, 1984
>
>
>
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
