teh following is an article in today's Christian Science Monitor. It 
describes how people are not participating in community organizations 
any longer. Robert Putnam of Harvard thinks it is because people prefer 
their television sets and computers to actual human interaction. I 
think it is because people are afraid of interacting with other people. 
The politics, the conformity, cliqueishness, and the fear of rejection 
all combine to influence our profound isolation from each other. 

I don't think there is any issue that is more important to our economic 
and political-economic future than this. We ignore history to our 
peril, and, today, we are even ignoring our economic history. The more 
socially isolated  we become, the less we care about our neighbors, and 
the more we can tolerate violence, abuse, and social and economic 
degeneration, as long as it occurrs to others. When it occurrs to 
ourselves, then we have no one to blame but ourselves, and ourshame 
will exacerbate our isolation. In my view, this is all encouraged by 
our economic and political elite on both the "Right" and "Left."

We no longer even have extended families today as a unit of social 
organization. I think that if we look at the history of the American 
"South" between the Civil War and World War II, we will see our future.

Hugh McGuire

Elks and Lions (Clubs) may go way of the
dodo

Copyright © 1998 Nando.net
Copyright © 1998 The Christian Science Monitor 

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (August 24, 1998 11:25 a.m. EDT 
http://www.nandotimes.com) -- Brian Clark, an advertising executive, 
followed in his dad's footsteps and joined the Lions Club when he 
returned to Little Rock two years ago. But this father-and-son pair is 
becoming a rarity.

In the 1990s, civic and fraternal organizations - from the Elks to the 
Moose - have seen membership plummet. At the Little Rock Sertoma Club, 
for instance, only seven members usually attend the weekly Wednesday 
luncheon. Ten years ago, members filled a room that seats close to 50 
people.

"Most (of these groups) have been around for nearly 100 years. ... 
They've run into trouble because of a lot of social change," says 
Robert Putnam, professor of government at Harvard University in 
Cambridge, Mass. "People would rather be alone in front of a television 
set than out with a group."

Since the 1970s, Americans have altered the way they spend free time. 
Instead of going to bridge clubs and supper parties, they watch TV, go 
to the gym, surf the Web, or simply relax alone. Families move around 
more and break apart more, too.

For organizations like the Lions, which raises money for a number of 
charities including the blind, to continue, the next generation must 
sign up. But those in Generation X simply don't seem to have any urge 
to unite with their fellow man.

"In the past, people felt a need for organized thought," says Chris 
Counts, a local actor. "There was a sense of power in unity. Now, I 
think, we have an era where individuality is the calling. ... The only 
united groups seem to have a negative public image like the IRA or 
skinheads and even most political parties."

Personally, he adds, "I'd rather be at home on my computer."

Putnam is writing a book on the future of civic organizations and the 
country's need for community. He points to several changing aspects of 
American society that parallel the decline in what he calls "animal 
clubs."

For instance, dinner parties, once a social staple, have declined 60 
percent in the last 20 years. Neighbors no longer visit each other. 
That interaction has declined between 20 to 25 percent, according to 
Putnam.

Playing cards doesn't even hold appeal anymore. Statistics show that in 
the past 15 years card playing has dropped 60 percent. At this rate, no 
one will play cards in this country by 2013.

Social and civic groups began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries 
as a way for people to connect with each other in the midst of change. 
Urbanization, immigration, and mechanization rapidly changed life after 
the Civil War. As the start of the 21st century looms, the country is 
once again suffering disconnection.

People, though, are no longer joiners. They prefer to do a volunteer 
project for a day and go home. Many would rather just sign a check than 
do any labor. Long-term commitments don't fit well in fast-paced 
lifestyles.

Jim Stanley, an Arkansas lawyer, has seen this apathy often. In 
September, he will become president of the North Little Rock Sertoma 
Club, an organization that helps the hearing and speech impaired. He 
has tried several recruitment methods to try to lure people, especially 
younger members.

"People seem detached from joining organizations," says Stanley, who 
has been involved in several civic groups. "It's this attitude about 
me, me, me. It seems the pride of being in these kind of groups is 
gone. Even corporations have a different philosophy than they did years 
ago."

Once corporations encouraged employees to join Rotary International, 
the Lions Club, or Kiwanis. Stanley says this no longer is true.

He wrote 150 letters to local corporations and businesses trying to 
recruit new members. Only five responded. Because of changes in tax 
laws, many corporations no longer pay organizational dues for
employees.

While roughly 60 percent of Rotary members attend the weekly luncheon, 
more businessmen and women are finding it harder to spare an hour or 
two to hobnob and listen to speakers.

The element of prestige that these clubs once held has vanished. Many 
younger people think that groups such as the Shriners, Masons and 
Rotary do not have enough diversity.

Rotary, however, has changed. A U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1988 
allowed women to join the organization. Shortly after the decision, new 
women members signed up 20 times faster than men, and today female 
membership holds steady.

But the "animal clubs" appear to be teetering on the brink of 
extinction. Membership in the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks 
stood at 1.3 million in 1996, a 21 percent decline from its peak 15 
years ago. Between 1985 and 1995, the Lions Club saw membership drop 
about 14 percent. The Shriners were off 32 percent from 1979 to 1996, 
the Jaycees, 44 percent.

"People would rather sign a check," insists Janet McMahan, public 
relations manager for the Lions Club in Oak Brook, Ill.

"It's an unfortunate trend to try and reverse. Clubs like ours give 
very valuable services to their communities. People take for granted 
that they are around. If they weren't, every community would notice the 
difference," she says.

Putnam also cites falling numbers of parent-teacher associations, 
volunteers with the Red Cross and the Boy Scouts, and labor union 
membership.

Putnam hesitates to say the Internet has played a part in this decline, 
saying the decline started before Bill Gates graduated from elementary 
school.

Instead, he says, it's simply about reinventing the organizations so 
they work again in a new society. "It's a real challenge for the 
country," he says. "And yes, the Internet will play into this. It can 
be part of the problem or part of the solution."

By SUZI PARKER, The Christian Science Monitor

Reply via email to