Victor Milne wrote:
> My point is that if a simple model of dominance does not apply very well to
> equine behaviour, it's certainly a mistake to extend it to human behaviour.
Who ever said anything about "simple" or "model"?
> >hierarchies and
> >ranges of human (& other) behavior have always existed and will most likely
> >continue to do so despite any structural changes invented & applied. It
> >makes democracy somewhat irregular at best. But I'm not advocating
> >dictatorship, just realistic expectations if humans plan to peacefully
> >narrow the gap between rich & poor.
> [snip]
Steve
--
"To teach how to live without certainty, and yet without being
paralyzed by hesitation, is perhaps the chief thing that philosophy,
in our age, can still do for those who study it."
Bertrand Russell, "A History of Western Philosophy"
