>Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:35:37 -0800
>From: Sid Shniad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BELL CANADA INVESTIGATING CREATION OF NEW SERVICES FOR  OPERATORS
>TO MINIMIZE ATTRITION
>
>Canadian Communications Network Letter                 January 25, 1999
>
>Renegotiating with US company over ownership --
>
>BELL CANADA INVESTIGATING CREATION OF NEW
>SERVICES FOR OPERATORS TO MINIMIZE ATTRITION
>
>A shell-shocked Bell Canada is doing all it can to appear conciliatory
>with its operators as it wraps up its second week of damage control.
>The telco is trying to placate the Communications, Energy and
>Paperworkers Union -- and its own customers -- by claiming it failed
>to provide an accurate message when announcing it would outsource
>operator services. The telco has also backed off its hard line tactics to
>cut wages overnight and turn the division over to a majority-owned US
>call centre operator.
>
>Bell now suggests it would "consider" a majority ownership position in
>the new company with Excell Global Services, but Excell may have
>limited interest in being a minority partner of a company spawned amid
>public turmoil. The telco is no doubt burning the midnight oil with Excell
>executives to see if there's a way for all parties to emerge unscathed.
>Meanwhile, the operators' 52 offices in 39 municipalities in Ontario and
>Quebec will be amalgamated into fewer locations which are yet to be
>determined.
>
>Paulette Beaudry-Klug, VP operator services at Bell Canada, told
>Network Letter that creating the new company is actually Bell's answer
>for keeping operators employed. The union, most of the media and the
>public have berated the telco for planning to outsource operator
>services by creating the new company. Either Bell failed to telegraph its
>intentions to protect operators' employment via new services, or Bell's
>spin-doctors have suddenly created new policy in the guise of Bell's
>original scheme.
>
>Bell claims it is trying to reverse a trend where calls requiring operators
>are steeply declining. The telco has been monitoring US models where
>operators have provided tourist travel information and performed other
>call centre-style services for telco customers. If this is indeed the case,
>it begs the question why the union incited the public's wrath just as Bell
>was investigating task creation to keep its members on the payroll.
>Granted, the operators are destined to earn less after the new company
>is established, but that could be the trade-off for even a small degree of
>job security.
>
>Bell says it was willing to discuss a transition period with the union, but
>it didn't get the chance before the issue ignited. "We prefer not to
>negotiate through the newspapers," says Beaudry-Klug. "Our
>negotiations with our partner (Excell) have also not been concluded at
>this point. (It's) a very unfortunate situation where there has been
>misquoting and a misunderstanding about what was going to happen.
>
>"It is important to us not only to keep these jobs in our country, but also
>to demonstrate we have something to be proud of," she adds. "An
>American company is prepared to come in and invest in a business that
>we believe we can turn around and offer. We'll negotiate with our
>partner and see where the ownership will end up when negotiations are
>completed."
>
>It appears operator services were in jeopardy long before Bell starting
>looking for a partner. Last year, Bell operators handled about 83 million
>calls, compared with more than 200 million 10 years ago. Five years
>from now, operators are predicted to be handling about half the current
>volume under the status quo. With the advent of automated toll
>technologies, voice recognition equipment and free directory assistance
>on the Internet, "live agents" are less in demand than ever before. In
>tandem with losing about 30 per cent LD market share to competition
>over the past few years, Bell knew it had to act.
>
>The future of operator services is unclear, but Bell sounds interested in
>assigning new tasks to those who choose to stick it out. "In the US, if
>you're visiting somewhere for the first time and you want to organize a
>business dinner or see a show, you can dial 411 information," explains
>Beaudry-Klug. "Not only will they connect you, they'll even make
>reservations if you're interested. More and more travellers to the US are
>returning here and asking why we don't have those services in this
>country." The service could also provide contemporary information on
>weather, road conditions and traffic reports, as well as provide
>on-the-spot destination routes for travellers.
>
>"We believe if Bell Canada can be the first to offer those services, it
>would be a golden opportunity," she adds. "We have the expertise and
>technology -- we just needed to find a partner that has already lived
>through the transformation that the industry is going through, and has
>done so in a successful manner. They can bring their marketing, sales
>and international expertise and help us be the first. That's what this is
>all about."
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>UNION COMMISSIONS SURVEY THAT SHOWS BELL UNPOPULAR
>
>A survey commissioned by the Communications, Energy and
>Paperworkers Union says 73 per cent of respondents believe Bell
>Canada's handling of its operators will have a negative effect on the
>economy. Up to 63 per cent are reported willing to take action to protest
>Bell's decision to outsource the division to a US firm that is one-third
>owned by Bell. The survey says half of the respondents plan to switch
>to other carriers and 67 per cent want the government to withdraw all
>funding and financial support....
>




Reply via email to