>The Chicago Tribune                                            July 12, 1999
>
>A 'GROTESQUE' GAP:
>
>The global economy's winners and losers are so far apart that balancing 
>efforts are needed to avoid disaster, according to a new UN overview.
>
>       By R.C. Longworth
>       Tribune Staff Writer
>
>As the global economy grows, rich nations are getting richer than ever, and
>poor ones are stuck in shantytowns on the outskirts of the global village.
>"Global inequalities in income and living standards have reached grotesque
>proportions," the UN Development Program said in its annual global overview,
>the Human Development Report.
>
>For instance:
>
>The richest countries, such as the United States, have 20 percent of the
>world's people but 86 percent of its income, 91 percent of its Internet
>users, 82 percent of its exports and 74 percent of its telephone lines. The
>20 percent living in the poorest countries, such as Ethiopia and Laos, have
>about 1 percent of each.
>
>The three richest officers of Microsoft--Bill Gates, Paul Allen and Steve
>Ballmer--have more assets, nearly $140 billion, than the combined gross
>national product of the 43 least-developed countries and their 600 million
>people.
>
>The United States, meanwhile, has more computers than the rest of the world
>combined. Lesser-developed countries are not likely to catch up any time
>soon: the same computer that costs a month's wages for the average American
>takes eight years' income from the average resident of Bangladesh.
>
>The 200 richest people in the world more than doubled their net worth
>between 1994 and 1998. But in nearly half the world's countries, per capita
>incomes are lower than they were 10 or 20 years ago. Some of these are
>oil-producing nations hit by the long slump in oil prices, but many are in
>sub-Saharan Africa, where per capita income has fallen to $518 from $661 in
>1980.
>
>In 1960, the richest fifth of the world's people had 30 times as much income
>as the poorest fifth. By 1997, that proportion had more than doubled, to
>74-1.
>
>The key to a solution to these problems, the UNDP said, is not to stamp out
>the global economy but to embrace it with the rules and institutions that
>will ensure it serves people and communities, not just markets and their
>manipulators.
>
>"Competitive markets may be the best guarantee of efficiency but not
>necessarily of equity," it said. "Markets are neither the first nor the last
>word in human development.
>
>"Many activities and goods that are critical to human development are
>provided outside the market, but these are being squeezed by the pressures
>of global competition.
>
>"When the market goes too far in dominating social and political outcomes,
>the opportunities and rewards of globalization spread unequally and
>inequitably--concentrating power and wealth in a select group of people,
>nations and corporations, marginalizing the others.
>
>"The challenge," the report said, "is not to stop the expansion of global
>markets. The challenge is to find the rules and institutions for stronger
>governance . . . to preserve the advantage of global markets and competition
>but also to provide enough space for human, community and environmental
>resources to ensure that globalization works for people, not just for
>profits."
>
>The gap between people, like the one between nations, also is growing in the
>global economy, the UNDP report said. Inequality is growing both in
>industrialized nations--especially in the United States, Britain and Sweden,
>it said--and in newly industrializing countries, such as China and the
>formerly communist countries of Eastern Europe.
>
>One result of globalization, it said, is that the road to wealth-- the
>control of production, patents and technology--is increasingly dominated by
>a few countries and companies.
>
>Of all the countries in the world, only 10, including the United States,
>account for 84 percent of global research-and-development spending.
>Businesses and institutions in the same 10 control 95 percent of all patents
>issued by the U.S. government over the past 20 years, it said.
>Among corporations, the top 10 controlled 86 percent of the
>telecommunications market, 85 percent of pesticides, 70 percent of computers
>and 60 percent of veterinary medical products, it said.
>
>The major countries and the global corporations may have earned their
>dominance, but, the report said, this monopoly of power is cutting poorer
>nations off from a share of the economic pie and, often, from decent health
>care and education.
>
>"The privatization and concentration of technology are going too far," the
>report said. "Corporations define research agendas. . . . Money talks, not
>need. Cosmetic drugs and slow-ripening tomatoes come higher on the priority
>list than drought-resistant crops or a vaccine against malaria."
>
>Many new technologies, "from new drugs to better seeds," are priced too high
>for poor nations, it said. Global patent laws, intended to protect
>intellectual property, are blocking the ability of developing countries to
>develop their own products.
>
>Even within the Third World, inequality is sharp. Thailand has more cellular
>phones and Bulgaria more Internet users than all of Africa except South
>Africa, the report said.
>
>The report was not all gloom and doom. Even as gaps between nations grow and
>some countries slide backward, the quality of life for many of the world's
>poor is improving, it said.
>
>Between 1975 and 1997, life expectancy in Third World countries rose to 62
>years from 53, adult literacy rates climbed to 76 percent from 48 percent,
>child mortality rates to 85 per 1,000 live births from 149, and some
>countries --Costa Rica, Fiji, Jordan, Uruguay and others--"have overcome
>severe levels of human poverty."
>
>The UNDP report said uneven and unequal development around the world is not
>sustainable and risks sinking the global economy in a backlash of public
>resentment.
>
>Without global governance that incorporates a "common core of values,
>standards and attitudes, a widely felt sense of responsibility and
>obligations," the major nations and corporations face trade wars and
>uncontrolled financial volatility, it said, with the Asian financial crisis
>of the past two years only the first of many upheavals.
>
>At the moment, new rules and regulations are being written in talks at the
>World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund and other powerful
>global bodies. But these talks are "too narrow," the report said, because
>they focus on financial stability while "neglecting broader human concerns
>such as persistent global poverty, growing inequality between and within
>countries, exclusion of poor people and countries, and persisting
>human-rights abuses."
>
>They also are "too geographically unbalanced," with an unhealthy domination
>by the U.S. and its allies."
>
>The UNDP report called instead for a "global architecture" that would
>include:
>
>- A global central bank to act as a lender of last resort to strapped
>countries and to help regulate finance markets.
>
>- A global investment trust to moderate flows of foreign capital in and out
>of Third World countries and to raise development funds by taxing global
>pollution or short-term investments.
>
>- New rules for the World Trade Organization, including anti-monopoly powers
>to enable it to keep global corporations from dominating industries.
>
>- New rules on global patents that would keep the patent system from
>blocking the access of Third World countries to development, knowledge or
>health care.
>
>- New talks on a global investment treaty that, unlike talks that failed
>last year, would include developing countries and respect local laws.
>
>- More flexible monetary rules that would enable developing countries to
>impose capital controls to protect their economies.
>
>- A global code of conduct for multinational corporations, to encourage them
>to follow the kind of labor and environmental laws that exist in their home
>countries. The report praised voluntary codes adopted in Asia by Disney
>World and Mattel, the toy company.
>
>The leading industrial nations already are considering new global rules on
>investment, banking and trade. The UNDP report, in effect, endorsed these
>efforts but urged that they be broadened to include the needs of poorer
>nations. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
regards,

Tom Walker
http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/worksite.htm

Reply via email to