John Verdon
Sr. Strategic HR Analyst
Directorate Military Personnel Force Development
Department of National Defence
Major-General George R. Pearkes Building
101 Colonel By Drive.
Ottawa Ontario
K1A 0K2
voice: 992-6246
FAX: 995-5785
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Searching for the pattern which connects.... and to know the difference that makes
a difference"
Sapare Aude
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 26 October, 2007 15:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Futurework Digest, Vol 47, Issue 19
Send Futurework mailing list submissions to
futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
*http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Futurework digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Universal soldier? (Cordell, Arthur: ECOM)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:15:12 -0400
From: "Cordell, Arthur: ECOM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Universal soldier?
To: "Darryl or Natalia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "futurework"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
This article has no place on FW. What does it have to do with the
future of work? If you wish to slam armies and the concept of war then
go to another site. If you want to slam Israel then, again, go to
another site.
Arthur
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darryl or
Natalia
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:05 PM
To: futurework
Subject: [Futurework] Universal soldier?
What is the future of work in the military to be? Most now fail to see a
future force of peace keepers, since it's pretty obvious that
controlling the oil industry and acquiring oil for the US are the
reasons for most budget allocations. But where does that leave those who
would otherwise have enlisted for a career of defense training, when the
actual reason for their services is merely one of overcoming and
overpowering?
Billions are spent on military technological improvements that result in
more destruction, deaths and displacement than conventional combat ever
did. An emphasis on killing, rather than actual defense, could account
for the most obvious failures.
In World Wars I and II, soldiers and citizens alike believed they were
defending our freedom. Far fewer came back from these wars so damaged
psychologically. For Viet Nam, Korea, the Gulf and Iraq wars there has
been a deployment of so-called freedom fighters with little to defend
but the psychotic egos of the ruling elite. Add to it that the
instruments of destruction are now much more sophisticated, and far more
harmful to all life forms. Today's soldiers are alarmingly more
disassociated from the human targets upon whom misery is inflicted
because of this sophistication of weaponry.
When an army recruits its troops, what checks are in place to prevent
Joe/Jill Psycho from joining the ranks of "defenders"? How many
different qualifying tests does he/she take? And once enlisted, what
restraints are ensuring that defense, rather than offense, be the
primary motivator for staying in the ranks? It's rather a silly
question, isn't it, because civilians aren't usually being protected in
these current wars, as evidenced by the high casualties, costly
mercenary protection for officials only, and Iraq's billion dollar
"Green Zone", isolated from any civilian interaction.
My deduction, by the recent wars' outcomes and horror stories, is that
offense is the operative motivation in modern warfare. I realize the
military has some expenditures on personnel who generate beneficial
human resources studies and policies, but these outlays, retained
primarily for the sake of having public relations reps who can actually
field questions, are utterly dwarfed by egregious budgets directed at
wiping out the so-called enemy at any expense. With such a pervasive
attitude, it's no wonder we have soldiers who are either freshly
enlisted or grow to be wholly dangerous.
An Israeli psychologist blames Israeli soldiers' immoral and criminal
behaviour on boredom and poor training. This is an insane explanation!
She's an apologist not only for incompetent army recruiters and top
command, but for sadistic individuals who must never be allowed to hide
behind the stress of boredom to justify relief at the expense of human
life or injury of any type.
>From everything I've ever read about soldiers anywhere they're
stationed, there are always too many amongst them who believe in their
right to be brutal -- and most of them get away with it because of
commanding officers' implicit approval or fellow troops covering for
them.
Israel boasts of having the most humane troops in the world in their
recruitment efforts. The article below certainly disputes that claim.
How many armies of any global significance are left that can define
their jobs as being ones which consist strictly of defense? The
Pentagon's budget, the US's most crippling, undergoes scant approval,
checks or balances. It reaps the largest share of the treasury, thereby
establishing its department (if we measure in terms of dollars) as the
most revered, above health and welfare, environment, education, etc. Yet
the department does nothing beneficially significant for anyone anywhere
(excepting the elites' portfolios) and generates more harm than could
ever be imagined. One might well conclude that waste by warring is what
Americans most value, and that the future expenditures of their nation
are assuredly focused upon continued psychotic activity, if not for the
painful fact that the immoral self-serving ruling elite actually have
control of how the treasury is spent. Same goes for Israel.
The future of work, by reason of treasury allocations, is in killing or
overcoming, first and foremost. Yet there's no money in it but for the
elite and the mercenaries. So, national troops are either initially
misled into believing they are developing a career defending their
nation, are being recruited against their will, or are being selected
specifically because they possess criminal and immoral minds. You can't
train that many troops to become immoral, can you? But you can recruit
those who are potentially volatile, such as the many sickos and
criminals recruited thus far, and then expose them to stressors the
individuals might never have anticipated -- such as boredom, extreme
heat, extreme vigilance, DU, abhorrence by civilians, and realization of
the fact that their lives mean nothing to those really in command. This
is the state of the military today. Its future is even more bleak, with
projected urban wars. Perhaps that's where it will itself be overcome
and forever disbanded.
Until voters recognize they are being chronically manipulated into
voting for yet another hawkish leader, the future of being a legal bully
looks just "Bully".
Natalia Kuzmyn
Israel shaken by troops' tales of brutality against Palestinians
A psychologist blames assaults on civilians in the 1990s on soldiers'
bad training, boredom and poor supervision
Conal Urquhart in Jerusalem
Sunday October 21, 2007
The Observer <*http://*www.observer.co.uk>
A study by an Israeli psychologist into the violent behaviour of the
country's soldiers is provoking bitter controversy and has awakened
urgent questions about the way the army conducts itself in the Gaza
Strip and West Bank.
Nufar Yishai-Karin, a clinical psychologist at the Hebrew University in
Jerusalem, interviewed 21 Israeli soldiers and heard confessions of
frequent brutal assaults against Palestinians, aggravated by poor
training and discipline. In her recently published report, co-authored
by Professor Yoel Elizur, Yishai-Karin details a series of violent
incidents, including the beating of a four-year-old boy by an officer.
The report, although dealing with the experience of soldiers in the
1990s, has triggered an impassioned debate in Israel, where it was
published in an abbreviated form in the newspaper Haaretz last month.
According to Yishai Karin: 'At one point or another of their service,
the majority of the interviewees enjoyed violence. They enjoyed the
violence because it broke the routine and they liked the destruction and
the chaos. They also enjoyed the feeling of power in the violence and
the sense of danger.'
In the words of one soldier: 'The truth? When there is chaos, I like it.
That's when I enjoy it. It's like a drug. If I don't go into Rafah, and
if there isn't some kind of riot once in some weeks, I go nuts.'
Another explained: 'The most important thing is that it removes the
burden of the law from you. You feel that you are the law. You are the
law. You are the one who decides... As though from the moment you leave
the place that is called Eretz Yisrael [the Land of Israel] and go
through the Erez checkpoint into the Gaza Strip, you are the law. You
are God.'
The soldiers described dozens of incidents of extreme violence. One
recalled an incident when a Palestinian was shot for no reason and left
on the street. 'We were in a weapons carrier when this guy, around 25,
passed by in the street and, just like that, for no reason - he didn't
throw a stone, did nothing - bang, a bullet in the stomach, he shot him
in the stomach and the guy is dying on the pavement and we keep going,
apathetic. No one gave him a second look,' he said.
The soldiers developed a mentality in which they would use physical
violence to deter Palestinians from abusing them. One described beating
women. 'With women I have no problem. With women, one threw a clog at me
and I kicked her here [pointing to the crotch], I broke everything
there. She can't have children. Next time she won't throw clogs at me.
When one of them [a woman] spat at me, I gave her the rifle butt in the
face. She doesn't have what to spit with any more.'
Yishai-Karin found that the soldiers were exposed to violence against
Palestinians from as early as their first weeks of basic training. On
one occasion, the soldiers were escorting some arrested Palestinians.
The arrested men were made to sit on the floor of the bus. They had been
taken from their beds and were barely clothed, even though the
temperature was below zero. The new recruits trampled on the
Palestinians and then proceeded to beat them for the whole of the
journey. They opened the bus windows and poured water on the arrested
men.
The disclosure of the report in the Israeli media has occasioned a
remarkable response. In letters responding to the recollections, writers
have focused on both the present and past experience of Israeli soldiers
to ask troubling questions that have probed the legitimacy of the
actions of the Israeli Defence Forces.
The study and the reactions to it have marked a sharp change in the way
Israelis regard their period of military service - particularly in the
occupied territories - which has been reflected in the increasing levels
of conscientious objection and draft-dodging.
The debate has contrasted sharply with an Israeli army where new
recruits are taught that they are joining 'the most ethical army in the
world' - a refrain that is echoed throughout Israeli society. In its
doctrine, published on its website, the Israeli army emphasises human
dignity. 'The Israeli army and its soldiers are obligated to protect
human dignity. Every human being is of value regardless of his or her
origin, religion, nationality, gender, status or position.'
However, the Israeli army, like other armies, has found it difficult to
maintain these values beyond the classroom. The first intifada, which
began in 1987, before the wave of suicide bombings, was markedly
different to the violence of the second intifada, and its main events
were popular demonstrations with stone-throwing.
Yishai-Karin, in an interview with Haaretz, described how her research
came out of her own experience as a soldier at an army base in Rafah in
the Gaza Strip. She interviewed 18 ordinary soldiers and three officers
whom she had served with in Gaza. The soldiers described how the
violence was encouraged by some commanders. One soldier recalled: 'After
two months in Rafah, a [new] commanding officer arrived... So we do a
first patrol with him. It's 6am, Rafah is under curfew, there isn't so
much as a dog in the streets. Only a little boy of four playing in the
sand. He is building a castle in his yard. He [the officer] suddenly
starts running and we all run with him. He was from the combat
engineers.
'He grabbed the boy. I am a degenerate if I am not telling you the
truth. He broke his hand here at the wrist, broke his leg here. And
started to stomp on his stomach, three times, and left. We are all
there, jaws dropping, looking at him in shock...
'The next day I go out with him on another patrol, and the soldiers are
already starting to do the same thing."
Yishai-Karin concluded that the main reason for the soldiers' violence
was a lack of training. She found that the soldiers did not know what
was expected of them and therefore were free to develop their own way of
behaviour. The longer a unit was left in the field, the more violent it
became. The Israeli soldiers, she concluded, had a level of violence
which is universal across all nations and cultures. If they are allowed
to operate in difficult circumstances, such as in Gaza and the West
Bank, without training and proper supervision, the violence is bound to
come out.
A spokeswoman for the Israeli army said that, if a soldier deviates from
the army's norms, they could be investigated by the military police or
face criminal investigation.
She said: 'It should be noted that since the events described in Nufar
Yishai-Karin's research the number of ethical violations by IDF soldiers
involving the Palestinian population has consistently dropped. This
trend has continued in the last few years.'
________________________________
avast! Antivirus <*http://*www.avast.com> : Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 071025-1, 10/25/2007
Tested on: 10/25/2007 6:05:23 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: *http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/private/futurework/attachments/20071026/a6927c0a/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
*http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
End of Futurework Digest, Vol 47, Issue 19
******************************************
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
---
avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 071025-1, 10/25/2007
Tested on: 10/26/2007 1:05:12 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
