Hi Thomas,

At 13:04 24/03/02 -0800, you wrote:
<<<<
Would I invest in my citizen responsibilites if I had the time?  Only if
there was a pay-off.  It could be dollars, it could be credits against tax
or goods or services, it could be recognition, it could be the joy of being
involved in a meaningful way in which I would recieve something of value to
me.  Am I willing to invest the time to find such an arrangement?  No - it
would be unproductive for me as an individual, though intellectually I
agree it might be better for a civil society.
>>>>

You've put your finger right on the nub of the problem of modern
"democratic" society. The time and effort that any citizen would have to
invest in understanding and coming to a decision on the huge variety of
policy issues (never mind other looming problems) at any particular time
(such as elections) is so immense that we cannot expect them to do so. 

This is why turn-outs in developed countries have been steadily declining
for decades. And even those who bother to vote cannot be expected to agree
to all the items in their party's manifesto -- but perhaps only to two or
three of the main policies. And this is why policies have become slogans
and elections have become part of showbiz. 

For the past few years on FW I've been trying to puzzle this one out. The
conclusion I've come to is that something like "Policy Forums" will have to
evolve -- that is, if we are to retain any semblance of democracy. In other
words, instead of elections, there need to be specialised Policy Forums (on
local, national, international issues) which the citizen can join
voluntarily. This idea also involves much decentralisation of many issues
(e.g. garbage collection, primary schools, law and order) in which
"ordinary" people (that is, those who don't vote now) can take part in.

In the explosion of pressure groups (usually middle class so far -- and
usually on complex national issues) in the last few decades I think we can
see the beginnings of such Policy Forums, but it's still far from clear
whether this trend will turn out to be a viable historical development of
democracy in which all can take part if they want to.

Keith  


__________________________________________________________
“Writers used to write because they had something to say; now they write in
order to discover if they have something to say.” John D. Barrow
_________________________________________________
Keith Hudson, Bath, England;  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________

Reply via email to