Arthur Cordell quipped: > Naw, I think it was Swiss bankers..... > > Chris, prove that it wasn't.
Well, this thread has been about positive evidence and "cui bono", so you'd first have to explain what leads you to suspect Swiss bankers and which benefits they're supposed to have from 9/11. Hint: The insurance Swiss Re alone has to pay almost $1 Billion (2 if Silverstein wins the "double dip" lawsuit) for 9/11 -- 2001 was their first year with a deficit after 30 years --, and other effects on Swiss banks were pretty negative/costly too. Chris
