----- Original Message -----
From: G.
Stewart
To: Ed
Weick
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Pax Democratica - a proposal Ed,
Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that
the "coalition of the willing" is a new watershed. It was foreshadowed in
an almost unreported speech the President Bush gave in the Rose Garden to
diplomats, early in his term. I don't think I saw it discussed on
this list but it clearly foreshadowed a differently structured world. The
"few strong poles" that you anticipate would take us back to the old "balance of
powers" approach that one might have hoped we could get beyond in the 21st
Century. The problem with that, as distinct from "coalitions of the willing" is
that it is geographically based, always a recipe for trouble.
I'm not familiar with the World Federalists
but thought they wanted world government, whereas the Commons is designed
to move beyond the quarrel between the two "world governments" we have
now, the UN and the US, although I agree with you that the UN has certainly been
winged.
Beyond all the "deploring" (eloquent on
this list!) I've seen little in the way of thinking about what people
would like to see, beyond what is (discouragingly), merely
"expected!"
Thanks again,
Gail
Gail Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
- [Futurework] Pax Democratica - a proposal G. Stewart
- Re: [Futurework] Pax Democratica - a proposal Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] Pax Democratica - a proposal G. Stewart
- Re: [Futurework] Pax Democratica - a propo... Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] Pax Democratica - a p... G. Stewart
- Re: [Futurework] Pax Democratica ... Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] Pax Democratica - a proposal Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: [Futurework] Pax Democratica - a proposal Karen Watters Cole
- G. Stewart