On Thu, 29 May 2003 17:54:22 -0700 Harry Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Brad, > > As I said earlier, women seem to like SUV's because they feel safer in them, something born out by the statistics. Henry, it is a bit confusing but you are basically right. Look below the
graphic.
The article
reported that the passenger of a car is 4 times more likely to die compared to
that of an SUV during an accident involving the two. The article also
reported that if a car were hit on the side, the likelihood of death became 27
times greater for the passenger of the car compared to the
SUV. The
main reason for the cause in the increase of the death rate during accidents
involving cars and SUVs is because of the design of the car. The issue of
the New York Times reported that a car is designed to meet that standards
of being able to withstand a collision with a similarly shaped vehicle within
500 pounds of its own weight. SUVs, though, tend to weigh at least 1000
pounds more than the average car. www.arches.uga.edu/~surbizo/Suv%2520rollover.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.arches.uga.edu/~surbizo/deathrate.html&h=394&w=556&prev=/images%3Fq%3DSUV%2Baccidents%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG
Bill
> It seems to me that most cars now are advertised as reaching 60 in 3 > > seconds, or something, and screaming around corners on mountain > courses > inches away from a precipitous drop. > > That advertising is for the testerone types (who may never actually > drive > very fast through city traffic). > > Harry > ---------------------------------------- > > Brad wrote: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Males without power tend to prefer SUVs, The bigger the better. > > > >Maybe you "nave the numbers"? > > > >But I would have *thought* that males without > >power would prefer: > > > > (1) Pickup trucks, and/or > > > > (2) Sports cars (incl. American "muscle cars", > > "hot rods", etc.). > > > >"Little GTO, you're really doing fine -- 3 deuces and > >4 four speed, and a 389...." (ref. lost) > > > > America has taken the automobile into its heart, > > and the automibile has taken over America. > > (--Eric Severeid) > > > >\brad mccormick > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 4:03 PM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brad McCormick, Ed.D. > >>Subject: Re: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V. problem > >> > >>Brad McCormick wrote: > >> > >>>Instead of S.U.V.s, people should buy "cabs" for > >>>"semis" -- you know, the big trucks that do long distance > >>>freight hauling. Most of them have a sleeping compartment > >>>behind the driver's seat, many hae television > >> > >>Almost there! http://poseur.4x4.org/futuresuv.html > >>;-) > >>Chris > > > **************************************************** > Harry Pollard > Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles > Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 > Tel: (818) 352-4141 -- Fax: (818) 353-2242 > http://home.attbi.com/~haledward > **************************************************** > > |
- Re: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V. problem Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- Re: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V. pro... Harry Pollard
- Re: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V.... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- Re: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V.... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- RE: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V. pro... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V. pro... William B Ward
- Re: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V.... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- RE: [Futurework] The solution to the S.U.V. pro... Cordell . Arthur