There
was a good review of the case on TV0 last evening. (I will try to find a
transcript of the programme). An ex-CSIS (our version of the CIA) agent on
one side and Arar's lawyer on the other.
An
interesting case.
How to
protect civil rights in a state of perceived national emergency.
It
recalls the treatment of the Japanese-Americans during WW2. During the
crisis it all made sense. After the crisis there was much
hand-wringing.
Maybe
that is the definition of crisis. A loss of collective judgement.
Hence the statement "don't shout fire in a crowded theatre"
It may
set off a crisis where people will lose their collective judgement and trample
the rights of others.
The
question is: Is there a national crisis? Why send this person to
Syria? Was there a deal in place that the Syrians would get the truth out
of Arar through techniques that wouldn't be allowed in Canada? (Much as
the US used locals in Viet Nam to administer torture to "Viet Cong"
prisoners).
arthur
|
- [Futurework] The Arar Case Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] The Arar Case wbward
- Re: [Futurework] The Arar Case Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] The Arar Case Ed Weick
- RE: [Futurework] The Arar Case Cordell . Arthur
- RE: [Futurework] The Arar Case Harry Pollard