These are the roots of our being based in the
learning of our perceptions as put well by Keith in his explanations of the
brain. I agree with both you and Karen. For me it is
about telling the truth as we perceive it and developing skill, technique,
beauty etc. Truth and Ideals.
As for Pre-Columbian Art it is all in being able to
read it. It is not anymore bizarre than impressionistic or
expressionistic art which also is a matter of reading. It does tend
to stir up the images of our own demons from Breugel to the horror demons in the
movies. I can remember when Howl was pretty strange (in college)
Basically the Pre-Columbian Gods and Art are
about learning and the issues of what it means to learn in the
world. The same lesson as is found in the great circles all across
the Americas. The Mexicans were more dramatic and fundamentalist in
their expressions. For example the Xipe Totec in the East wore the
skin of a human. In the North the Cree simply see it as a
coat. In both cases it is habits that are not native to the person
but are the lessons of the teacher that are simply imitative and must move from
the beginning into adolescence where they are ripped to pieces by the analysis
of science and the watering of practice to become the mature dialogue of the
West or the joining of earth and sky in the mature human being. That
is the practicing artist for them or the artistry of everyday life.
Quetzalcoatl. Life is represented as metaphor since all
of reality is essentially unknowable except as metaphor between individual
universes. Suffice it to say that learning the language makes all of
these things seem more natural and less strange. That is one of the
powerful lessons of art to all humanity.
REH
|
- [Futurework] Critical Assumptions Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: [Futurework] Critical Assumptions Keith Hudson
- Re: [Futurework] Critical Assumptions Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: [Futurework] Critical Assumptions Karen Watters Cole
- Re: [Futurework] Critical Assumptions Ed Weick
- Ray Evans Harrell