Harry Pollard wrote: > Chris, > > You thought, for some reason the Pettigrew quote was significant > when actually it says nothing. It was: ... > Consequently, the effects > of tree trade are no longer necessarily positive for everyone.>> > > How about? ... > Consequently, the effects > of tree trade are no longer necessarily negative for everyone.>> > > Makes just as much sense.
Since Ricardo suggested that FT's effects are _positive_ for everyone, the news is that (under modern conditions) they're _no longer_ positive -- not that they're "no longer negative". If you didn't even grasp Logic 101 and Math 101, how do you want to teach economics at your school ? (but I guess private pupils won't notice anyway) Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword "igve". _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
