Agree, Ray. I
don’t even think ‘saving the world’ is possible, but improving it is. If we align
ourselves as coalitions around issues, we have short term results. We need a
movement, broadly based, perhaps a Second Revolution. Mostly I
wanted other FWers who might have an interest to see the list of other
organizations for their own references. But it wouldn’t
hurt to let women have more room at the table, would it? Hope you are
well and warm. I’ve seen the
forecast for the NE. We’ve had 6 inches of rain here the past few days. No worries about running out of Bull Run
drinking water for now. - Karen REH wrote: Karen, I
applaude the rise in organizations from each group that present unique views
that give us all more scope and wisdom in our contexts. But I reject that
any one group or person will serve a messianic purpose and save the
world. We each do that one step at a time by being responsible to
our own gifts, talents and groups through an enlightened activism.
I sound like that Geo-Libertarian that Robert wrote about. But I'm
not. I speak from my own side of the wheel but I must depend on others to
speak of the place where they sit. But putting our ideas
together we can become one whole human and plan well for the children. Here
is another piece of Women On The Rise journalism,
with an imposing date. Relax, just
ovaries are mentioned this time. -
KWC Women Will Have to Save the World
Marlene Nadle, Pacific
News Service, September 11, 2003 President Bush may not face much opposition in Congress to his plan for
perpetual preemptive war, but he better watch out for the women. Angry over the swagger of violence
coming out of the White House, disgusted by the bring-'em-on itch for a fight
as the solution to political problems, women around the globe are organizing in
new ways. These gender activists are on the Internet, in the streets, packed into
rooms forming more groups and pushing resolutions through the United Nations.
Some are setting up an Occupation Watch Center in Baghdad, and others are
building a transnational movement. They even have their first martyr in Rachel
Corrie, the young American who was killed trying to stop an Israeli bulldozer
from destroying Palestinian homes. The surge of women's activism is happening now partly as a response to
9/11. That event accelerated the growth of new groups like England's Global Women's Strike and Central Asia's Worldwide Sisterhood Against Terrorism and War.
Explaining her own reaction to that trauma and the macho strut of both
bin Laden and Bush, Code Pink
founder Medea Benjamin says, "I had feelings and fears I never had in all
my years of organizing. The male aggressive voice was so very dominant. We
needed to strengthen the voices opposed to that. Mobilizing women was one way
to do it." Her reaction to violent solutions is shared by Indian writer
Arundhati Roy who calls bin Laden Bush's "dark doppelganger." The new organizing is more than an attack on personalities. As Jasmina
Tesanovic, a member of Women in Black in Serbia, says, "My enemy is no
longer a bad hero, or a politician, or a person in power, but the culture that
makes such primitive people possible and empowers them." The organizing is
part of a culture war to end the love of military glory, power, dominance and
hierarchy often taught as part of male traditions. New Profile, a women's group
in Israel, demands a complete reevaluation of its country's "military
consciousness." To counter a male habit of imposing power and dominance in postwar
periods women diplomats and non-government organizations pressured the United
Nations to pass Resolution 1325,
calling for women's full participation in nation building. Now, Iraqi women are
organizing to stop Bush from running their country as a Boy's Club. They are
being supported and advised by the U.N. Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), the Network of Kosovo Women, Women
to Women International, PeaceWomen,
and a deluge of visiting groups. This international alliance is aiding Iraqi women's own efforts to
protest violent rapes, honor killings and the rise of fanatics. "We fear
the threat of fundamentalist religious movements which an occupying army
inspires," the Iraqi Women's League
said in a recent statement. The activists count on women in postwar and prewar situations to argue
for political solutions to macho face-offs. They encourage them to use their
social training in settling issues with words, cooperation, and even empathy
for enemies. There are no illusions about ovaries making all women good and peaceful.
Instead, Ann Snitow of the Network of East-West Women urges women to
acknowledge their past complicity with men's wars. Few expect Bush National
Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to give up her allegiance to traditional male
stomp-and-rule values. But men who share their alternate vision are welcome in
the movement. The women may be waging a culture war, but that doesn't mean they can't
do down-and-dirty politics with Bush. In an incident that's an early warning
about the 2004 elections, a group of women greeted a fundraising George W. Bush
in Los Angeles recently with a 40-foot pink rejection slip that read:
"You're Fired!" More significant is the change in young women who haven't been voting. In
a recent article in a weekly magazine on youth voting, 23-year-old Chantel
Azadeh said, "The last two years have done a number on a lot of people's
minds. This election I plan on getting involved. I think it's crucial that we
get Bush out of the White House." An MTV survey showed only 41 percent of
the young are planning to vote for Bush. The president's ominous mutterings about nuclear weapons in Iran and
North Korea are enough to keep gender activism going. Ditto the economic attack
on women's domestic needs in America and in countries that are its once and
future allies. Niki Adams of London's Global
Women's Strike is helping to organize a demand for a Women's Budget in 24 countries where her
group has members including, the United States. "Our slogan is 'Invest in caring, not in killing'," she says.
Even Madonna has joined the post-9/11 resistance with her new music video
"American Life" which satirizes the military superhero. Driven by
dread, the women activists will continue to multiply. They are haunted by
nightmare images of where the punch and counterpunch of superpower and
terrorist, occupier and occupied, will lead. "This is a desperate moment in our history," says playwright
Karen Malpede, who only half-jokingly adds, "I guess women will have to
save the world." Marlene Nadle is a journalist and Associate of the
Transregional Center for Democratic Studies at the New School for Social
Research in New York. |
- RE: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volcano) Karen Watters Cole
- RE: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volcano) Karen Watters Cole
- Re: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volca... Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for V... Karen Watters Cole
- Re: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is f... Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volcano) Cordell . Arthur
- Re: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volca... Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volca... Lawrence DeBivort
- RE: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volcano) Cordell . Arthur
- Re: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volca... Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: [Futurework] Reframing (was V is for Volcano) Cordell . Arthur