On Wed, Jul 08 2009, Thomas Adam wrote:
> I would step back a moment and consider the possibility of how useful
> still supporting librplay is. I know it's tangental to what you're
> asking -- and I will get back on topic in just a moment, but librplay
> sucks! The growing trend is pulseaudio, although this would penalise
> people on archaic installations of SunOS 3.2 -- shame.
*Shudder*. If that is the growing trend, heaven help us. I have
tried pulseaudio, and after intermittently having no sound, I was
forced back to Alsa. I have no real opinion on this issue (I have never
managed to get fvvwm to play sounds, and I am pretty sure I do not miss
that), but defaulting to pulseaudio would be premature, I think.
manoj
--
It is when I struggle to be brief that I become obscure. Quintus
Horatius Flaccus (Horace)
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
