On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 06:40:37PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 03:03:23PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > > I forgot to mention the ChangeLog. > > > > ChangeLog > > ========= > > ... > > > So in this way, it's still possible to generate a ChangeLog *after* the > > fact. > > Actually, with real changeset based development, the ChangeLog is > obsolete. A well maintained git history contains all the > information of the ChangeLog. Tools like tig make it very easy to > look for any information in the commit tree.
You and I have both got patches in tig, ISTR. :) But yes, I was thinking more of generating something, nevertheless, but a shortlog should be sufficient. -- Thomas Adam -- "It was the cruelest game I've ever played and it's played inside my head." -- "Hush The Warmth", Gorky's Zygotic Mynci.
