On 21:41 06 Apr 2002, Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On 06 Apr 2002 22:48:33 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: | > 3 - Now that xpmroot support PNG (and XBM) should we rename it (with a | > symbolic link from xpmroot to the new name)? If yes one may think | > that fvwm-root is a good name, but I do not think so because in fvwm | > "-" separated names are scripts. FvwmRoot is obviously bad, but what | > about "fvwmroot" ? | | If you ask me, I think every executable we install except for fvwm itself | (current fvwm2) should be prefixed with "fvwm-". fvwm-bug, fvwm-root, | fvwm-convert-2.4. fvwm-convert-2.6, fvwm-config.
I second this opinion. It shouldn't matter whther something's implementation is a script or not. -- Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/ Heaven could change from chocolate to vanilla without violating perfection. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Arromdee) -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
