On 13 Jun 2002 06:42:28 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > I think encoding=utf-8: is a good syntax; encoding is applied to strings > > and ideally (i.e. hopefully) users will not confuse it with font charset. > > Here the problem is that we can have a confusion with xft font name > which use "encoding=*". What about "string_encoding=*" or "str_encoding=*" > or "StrEncoding=*" or "StringEncoding=*" (and change shadow= to Shadow= > in the man page; of course the code will be case insensitive).
StringEncoding=utf-8 seems ok to avoid confusion with encoding=iso10646-1. > BTW, the new code will be ready on Monday (at least half ready as there > are pbs in the implementation: text conversion are done each time a > Flocale text drawing or text width function is called, as conversion > should be done only when the text change; I will come back on this pbs > later). This may cause 2.5.2 release delay, if you plan to release it > next week. We are not in harry, I suggested this week, because I have some time for this, I am not sure yet about the next week. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
