On 01 Nov 2002 15:06:22 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > By the way, I think all the > > ...Strut > > stuff is misnamed. It should all be named > > ...Struts > ^^^
I think it should follow the same logic as Border/NoBorder (I hope we will have side border options: !TitleBorder, !SideBorders, !OppositeBorder). > And I think > > PlacementOverlap(Percent)Penalties > > should be renamed to > > MinOverlap(Percent)PlacementPenalties This would be more intuitive. > So, don't be surprised when the old names stop working in future > 2.5.x releases. > > Also, I think the arguments of the EwmhBaseStrut command should > use "percent of screen size" as the default unit, not "pixels", > since virtually all other commands work like this. The new > syntax would the be > > EwmhBaseStrut 0p 576p 0p 432p To be honest, I would break compatibility (maybe in 3.0?) and use points for numbers without suffix and percents for numbers with '%' suffix. I.e.: 48 - 48 points (currently percents) 48p - 48 points 48% - 48 percents (currently not really supported, but it works) I think, it is good to add support for '%' in our geometry too. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
