On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:32:01PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 22 Nov 2002 10:42:51 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
[SNIP SNIP SNIP] > > Sure, this would all work, and almost nobody would be able to use > > FvwmProxy because it can be configured only by experts. Enough > > said, do what you want with the module, I will retire from any > > further module design. > > In my suggestion there are no *Command options and no functions, just > SelectCommand or as Jason suggested "Action Select". Reducing the number of configurable actions limits flexibility severely. When you don't have a "Mark" command, the module response must be hard coded. The same is true for any actions that should be run when the proxies are closed or aborted. > ConfigFvwmProxyDefaults file is not needed. > > Please describe the functionality that would be missing. I don't see any. > Both "FvwmProxy_Circulate Next (CurrentPage)" and "SendToModule FvwmProxy > Circulate Next (CurrentPage)" are equally intuitive (or not intuitive) for > a user. I never said functionality would be missing. I said inexperienced users will not be able to run FvwmProxy. Exactly like they are not able to run FvwmEvent, FvwmForm, FvwmScript or FvwmButtons. The config just too complex. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
