On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:02:17AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 02 Jan 2003 11:12:06 +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > > The problem is that since 2003-01-01 fvwm/fvwm is feature freezed! > > Yes, we do not get a warning message from Dominik ... > > I noticed you worked very hard to fulfil this date. > > I would not make dates holy, fvwm should be ready for the freeze first. > If we cut it on some date, it may be a set of random features not working > well together. Additionally, I see no problems if someone has plans (and > I wrote that I have my todo list, just didn't have a time to post it on > December) and asks for some additional time. > > Since we did not really discuss the freeze date. I suggest to do it now. > Let it be January, 15 for the core? At least we have a time to think what > is missing. >
I am not against this date. I will simply prefer a message from Dominik. I think that date are important if not we will never stop to add new features. As usual, freeze does not mean that no new feature at all should be added (the procedure is no vote against it and 2 votes for it). But we should spent our main fvwm time to test and fix fvwm and to do some special work (e.g., config, better web page, new format for our doc). Olivier -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
