On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:24:32PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 27 Mar 2003 15:15:30 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:35:05PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > On 27 Mar 2003 14:27:30 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > > > > > How difficult is it to make module aliases to work with KillModule > > > > too? > > > > > > This works since 2.3.x: > > > > > > Module FvwmButtons MyLeftTopBar > > > KillModule FvwmButtons MyLeftTopBar > > > > > > And "KillModule FvwmButtons" kills all aliases. > > > > I see. Is there any reason why I can't say just > > > > KillModule MyLeftTopBar > > Will then "KillModule FvwmButtons" mean kill only one alias (no alias) > or all aliases?
Only one. How about pattern matching as in DestroyModuleConfig: KillModule FvwmButtons* ? > Currently you can do both variants (for example, I use > "KillModule FvwmEvent to kill all event listeners). This was the reason > of this KillModule syntax, another reason is similarity of the Module > and KillModule syntaxes regarding aliases. Finally, currently you may > define "Module FvwmIconMan MyLeftTopBar" and it works. > > The global problem we have with aliases is that alias is optional for > modules, once we make the alias concept to be mandatory for all modules, > we may then think about changing the syntax of all module commands. > I will start a new thread about this later. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
