Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 26 Apr 2003 11:15:17 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote: > > > > On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Dan Espen wrote: > > > > > > The built in binding is: > > > > > > Mouse 0 R N Menu MenuFvwmRoot > > > > Maybe this should be changed to > > > > Mouse 1 R N Menu MenuFvwmRoot > > Mouse 2 R N Menu MenuFvwmRoot > > Mouse 3 R N Menu MenuFvwmRoot > > > > because 0 will match all buttons, also the scrollwheel on such mice. > > Perhaps this is a bit annoying. > > I think I already said my opinion in the past. IMHO, it should be simply: > > Mouse 1 R N Menu MenuFvwmRoot > > The internal bindings should be as minimal as possible (although > functional).
If someone disagreed, it must have been me, but I don't remember it. I think I put in the mouse 0 binding. I was trying to catch any mouse press for the user with no config file. I think that worked, we get a lot less emails about starting up Fvwm and not being able to get anything to work. I guess I don't understand the motivation of the few users that complain that there are any built in bindings and want to remove them. Why don't they just override them? Ie.: Mouse 4 R N Nop Anyway, if I was the one that objected, I don't care that much. Either binding the buttons 1-3 or only 1 is OK with me. -- Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
