On 21 May 2003 22:34:24 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:37:21AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > On 19 May 2003 09:34:19 +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > > > > On 19 May 2003 08:30:00 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:27:12PM +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > * Added x,r,w,f,i file conditions to the On command > > > > > > BTW, this means I don't think "-i" is a good name, ReadableImagePath is. > > > > After actually reading the sources, I see it is more "ReadableImage". > > > > So, I think I prefer these names instead: > > > > -x, -r, -f - the same as the equal file flags in test/shell/perl > > -X, -I, -M - search for the given executable/image/module in its PATH > > > > Dot no see why we need a "-". Moreover, if you want a -x (without > path search) give a full path to -X (with your terminolgy).
I didn't feel a need to mix things (-r does not searches in $PATH, so why should -x), think about non-Unix operating systems with a non slash. At least tcsh has separate -x and -X tests (the second works on $PATH). And no other shell I know searches in $PATH. But then fvwm is not shell. > So I think that x,r,w,f,i,m are ok. I really don't know, it is probably just my habit to write "-r file". Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
