On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:59:58AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 09 Jun 2003 12:08:39 +0100, Tim Phipps wrote: > > The old proposal is also to change the Style command to manipulate a > > "StyleFunction" function rather than have it maintain a style list. The > > StyleFunction would be run on every window that is created and would > > consist of a sequence of "WindowId XXX (<condition>) WindowStyle YYY" > > lines. The proposal would have to implement a command to delete lines > > from a function as a method of controlling the growth of the style list. > > As a debug aid there would be a PrintFunction command which would > > probably be useful on its own anyway. > > Should changing "the Style command to manipulate a StyleFunction" be done > before 2.6.0 or after it?
It should be done neither before nor after 2.6.0. Given the state of the function execution code, that would yield *horrible* performance. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
