On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:36:43AM +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:21:22PM +0100, Uwe Pross wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > On 16 Jan 2004 at 14:58:58 +0100, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > > > Use > > > > > > fprintf(stderr,"*** FVWM Bell: Abort function %s\n", action); > > > > I got: > > > > *** FVWM Bell: functions.c line 987 [MarkWindowAsActiveFunc] *** > > > > which comes from FvwmEvent. So I guess it is my fault :-\ > > > > I do not think that it is your fault :o) > > If you use my version of FVWM you never get these beeps (and the > function will be executed). But, for some reasons dominik does not > want that your setup work.
Would you *please* stop spreading these rumours? I really don't understand why you have to provoke this argument again. And it's useless too, since if we keep haggling over features that won't be implemented in 2.6 anyway, we will never get it done, and new features will never be written. Instead of focusing on these discussions - which stop me from doing any fvwm work for one to two months every time - how about doing some work towards the release together instead? Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
