On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:20:13PM +0100, Viktor Griph wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >         [Please retain the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >          so that the Debian BTS has a record of your input]
> >
> >         This was reported by a Debian user.
> >
> >       Recent versions of fvwm, while being able to detect other
> >versions of fvwm currently running:
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >__> fvwm
> >[FVWM][SetupICCCM2]: <<ERROR>> another ICCCM 2.0 compliant WM is running, 
> >try -replace
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >are unable to detect other window managers.(Tested with ratpoison and
> >woody's icewm, sarge's icewm, icewm-gnome, wm2, qvwm and
> >enlightment. Also fluxbox, blackbox, ion3, xfwm4, wmaker and twm,
> >making this almost every other window manager other than fvwm
> >itself).
> >
> >       Older versions of fvwm used to display this warning:
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >[FVWM][CatchRedirectError]: <<ERROR>> another WM is running
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >       But the newer ones do not, for reasons I could not debug. This
> >is a regression, and the other window managers are able to detect
> >fvwm and refuse to run.
> >
> >       Please see http://bugs.debian.org/328621 for details.
> >
> >       manoj
> >
> 
> I've done some tests and belive that this bug is due to a change in X with 
> XOrg 6.8. I've tested fvwm 2.5.16, 2.5.10 and 2.5.4 from the 2.5.x branch, 
> and all have the bug. However I'm sure that the bug was not present when I 
> used 2.5.4 (and probably not 2.5.10) actively. Thus it must be something 
> else that has changed since then. The bug is however not present in 
> 2.4.19, so it must be soemthing that has changed in the early 2.5.x 
> versions, which I weren't able to compile now.

No, the only change since at least 2.3.0 was introducing the
-replace option.  We haven't touched this code in *ages*.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

 --
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to