On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:42:17AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote: > >>Just some conciderations: The manpage states that styles are search for in > >>a specific order. I really fail to see how this information is useful > >>while examining the logic, other than for the face that matchig early will > >>save some comparitions. Am I missing something? > > > >Do you mean this text: > > > > They are searched in the reverse order stated. > > When two conflicting styles apply to the same window, the style > > that was changed last wins. > I've always thought the first sentece "They are searched in the reverse > order stated." referre back to the order given in the previous statement, > i.e I've read "stated" as "stated here". Now that you say it it is fullt > pssible, and probably makes more sence to interpet it as some sort of > double information the the second sentence you quoted.
Hm, I think this text has to be rewritten. Facts are:
* Styles issued later override styles issued earlier.
* Multiple styles in a single style line are parsed from left to
right, i.e.
Style * MouseFocus, SloppyFocus
is equivalent to
Style * MouseFocus
Style * SloppyFocus
(SloopyFocus wins).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
