On Wed, Apr 29 2009, Dan Espen wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is the http://www.fvwm.org/cgi-bin/fvwm-bug the preferred place
>> to report bugs? It is very hard to keep track of the state of the bug
>> if you do not know the bug ID -- and on submitting a bug the system
>> reports success, but doe not give an ID -- and bug does not seem to
>> show up in incoming.
>
> After the bug list got overloaded with spam
> I know I stopped paying attention.
>
>> I did not see an easy way to locate bugs I have submitted there
>> either. Here is the most recent bug report I submitted, and which I
>> can't locate again:
>>
>> ,----[ Titlebar can not show all characters ]
> ...
>> I am trying to triage the fvwm bugs reported against the Debian
>> packages, and send them to y'all, so that they can be looked at -- but
>> the bug submission page makes it hard to keep track of progress.
>>
>> I can send them here, of course, if that ias acceptable. For
>> the record, these are the currently open bug reports for fvwm in the
>> Debian BTS.
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=fvwm
>
> All these bugs seem to be Fvwm 1.
No. If you look at them, really, there are version numbers in
there. Most of them are 2.5.2X
> Our feeling here is that there is no reason anyone should be using Fvwm 1.
> It's not supported.
>
> I suggest you remove Fvwm 1 from Debian.
> It's not supported by anyone as far as I know.
Now that we have cleared up these are not fvwm1 bugs, can you
please look at them again?
manoj
--
In Pocataligo, Georgia, it is a violation for a woman over 200 pounds
and attired in shorts to pilot or ride in an airplane.
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
