On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:23:50AM -0500, coerver wrote: > > > rant: > > I have been using fvwm(2) for awhile < 2.0 and think its the > cat's meow. I recently joined the mailing list and several times I have > wanted to address the "default" look and feel. I recently installed > the latest stable fvwm2 on a solaris2.7 box at work and had to spend a > good deal of time getting the conifguration to look good. The man pages > are truly a(maze)ing ___but___ it takes time and how much time _do_ you > _really_ want to spend configuring your window manager? I am the first to > admit there are many things I don't understand about fvwm but I don't > care.. I just use it and like it. The default pager could look alot > better, the mwm-ishness could be minimized a bit etc.. etc. > > my point: fvwm2 could > have a nicer default look I think...
Yes, definitely - you are telling us no news. I think it's one of fvwm's major flaws. Fortunately, there is the fvwm-themes package nowadays, but we should do a better job of advertising it. > don't get me wrong.. the web site is nice, the list is great fvwm2 is the > perfect wm... etc > but the discussion to make default config prettier is justified and should > continue.. sorry for the rant next time I include some concrete > suggestions Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
