On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 05:08:32PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:39:58PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote: > > > "Rouben Rostamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Fvwm's home page at http://www.fvwm.org/ says: > > > > Similarly, the "Latest News" link takes us to: > > > > > > > > http://www.fvwm.org/generated/NEWS.html > > > > > > > > where again we are given no dates, thus we are left in the dark as > > > > to how "Late" the "Latest News" may be. > > > > > > Actually, if you scroll down to 2.4.15, it is dated. > > > Whats not dated is the news for 2.5.6 which says > > > "not released yet". > > > > If this becomes common practice, the instructions have to be > > added to the DEVELOPERS file. > > We've been getting dates inserted by the make_fvwmdist.sh shell > for a long time now.
I don't think so. I have not built a realease with a script for years. It's too unreliable. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
