On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 11:03, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 20 Jan 2004 09:56:57 -0500, Ben Winslow wrote:
> Please don't refer to the FVWM Perl library as FvwmPerl. You may refer > to it as "fvwm perllib". FvwmPerl is just one concrete module for > preprocessing and scripting purposes that happens to use this library. Sorry, I wasn't thinking about that when I wrote the mail--FvwmPerl just popped into my head (no doubt because of previous references to that module.) > > unsigned numbers. Since the positions are given relative to the current > > viewport, -1024 (e.g.) is a perfectly normal X coordinate; therefore, it > > doesn't make much sense to use an unsigned number (as it'll usually need > > to be converted back to a signed number to be useful.) The C modules > > treat frame_x/frame_y as ints, which are implicitly signed, so the > > behavior doesn't match in that case either. > > You are right, I will mark these fields to be signed in FVWM::EventNames. Excellent, thanks. -- Ben Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
