On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Dominik Vogt wrote: > I don't think so. Run > > $ xmodmap -pm
~>xmodmap -pm xmodmap: up to 3 keys per modifier, (keycodes in parentheses): shift Shift_L (0x32), Shift_R (0x3e) lock Caps_Lock (0x42) control Control_L (0x25), Control_R (0x6d) mod1 Alt_L (0x40), BadKey (0x7d), BadKey (0x9c) mod2 Num_Lock (0x4d) mod3 mod4 Super_L (0x73), BadKey (0x7f), Super_R (0x74) mod5 Mode_switch (0x5d), ISO_Level3_Shift (0x7c) > and > > $ xmodmap -pke ~>xmodmap -pke | egrep '(Alt)|(Meta)|(Shift)' keycode 50 = Shift_L keycode 62 = Shift_R keycode 64 = Alt_L Meta_L keycode 113 = ISO_Level3_Shift Multi_key keycode 124 = ISO_Level3_Shift keycode 125 = NoSymbol Alt_L keycode 156 = NoSymbol Meta_L > . This displays which modifiers are defined and which keys > generate them. The Shift_... or Alt_... key is probably > configured in an odd way. OK, shift+alt is producing Meta_L. But I expected applications including fvwm would interpret Alt and Meta as synonyms? -- Roland Hautz -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
