Actually I use litestep pretty extensively at work now. There
are definetly things that FVWM does that litestep can't, but there is a
bunch of built in stuff for litestep that I think the FVWM community
could take a look at. Add to that an insane amount of modules, and its
not as easy to write litstep off as it once was.m. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Toshi Isogai > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FVWM: Microsoft Patent > > The last time I tried to use this 'Litestep' on NT machine, which I > believe it was sometime around 2002/3, its functionality was not even > close to the level of fvwm. I used it for a while because it was the _________________________________________________ Scanned on 26 Feb 2004 18:09:37 Scanning by http://erado.com -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
