Sorry for my late answer... Am 2004-04-14 11:57:17, schrieb Bernard Lang: >On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:07:05AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 01:32:53AM +0100, Ukpong Ukpong wrote: >> > Hi all I am doing a projects using a fvwm and need to know the most stable >> > fvwm version in the 2.5.x series to use. >> >> If you need a stable version, use the latest 2.4.x release. None >> of the 2.5.x releases can be called stable. > >and in what time frame, very approximately, is a stable release >(version 2.6.x I guess) of 2.5 to be expected ? > ... or is it intended only for hackers, but not for normal users ?
I am using 2.5.8 as backport for Debian/WOODY and it works quiet well ;-) >Bernard Greetings Michelle -- Registered Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
