On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:04:25PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
I found the problem!
"/usr/local/libexec/fvwm/2.5.6" was not marked executable.
After changing that manualy it works.
But this happened on all my computers, so i guess there is a bug in the
Makefile....
Best regards
Klaus
> Klaus Umbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:29:34PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote:
> > > Klaus Umbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I just compiled fvwm 2.5.6 and now my pager is gone!
> > > >
> > > > [FVWM][executeModule]: <<ERROR>> No such module 'FvwmPager' in
> > > > ModulePath '/usr/local/libexec/fvwm/2.5.6'
> > > >
> > > > What can I do?
> > >
> > > Its working for me.
> > >
> > > Take a look for /usr/local/libexec/fvwm/2.5.6/FvwmPager,
> > > is that were its supposed to be? Is it there?
> >
> > Yes, it is there. When I tried to copy it there by hand I saw, that it
> > was.
>
> Well, if its there, and marked executable, I'm not sure.
> How about trying to run it from the command line, it should print:
>
> home> /tmp/fvwmtest256/libexec/fvwm/2.5.6/FvwmPager
> FvwmPager Version 2.5.6 should only be executed by fvwm!
>
> --
> Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
> To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
5) People say Linux is ugly. How does that make you feel?
Torvalds: They'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.
Let's see just how ugly they think it is when they have a few
bulletholes in them.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
