* Sep 27 00:01 Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Sep 26 23:24 Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * Sep 26 22:36 S. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:21:07PM -0600, S. Anderson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:27:21PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > > > > > Good evning! > > > > > > > > > > I've created a nice bar using FvwmButtons which I'm really > > > > > pleased with. For this bar I use StaysOnTop, I also use > > > > > MinOverlapPercentPlacement as default placement. I would > > > > > however like to go even further than StaysOnTop; is it > > > > > possible to make the bar space totaly clean, meaning no other > > > > > windows can be placed there, not even on another layer? Like a > > > > > really thick EdgeResistance on that window... :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > how about: EwmhBaseStruts 0 0 0 25 > > > > > > I just noticed in the man page the MinOverlapPlacementPenalties > > > style, you might want to read up on that, and Ewmh struts in the > > > man page... > > > > This indeed seem to be what I'm looking for, just have to go > > unstable first. Thanks! > > Also noticed there is something interesting called > EWMHPlacementUseWorkingArea. I've read the documentation on this a few > times but can't get it to work. If someone knows how to setup this > (the bar is at 30+0-0) feel free to help. :-)
I just tried "xprop | grep _NET_WM_STRUT" followed by clicking at the FvwmButtons, but no numbers appear. Is there a solution to this? -- Johan Svedberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://johan.svedberg.pp.se/ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
