Ray and Chris,

Thanks a ton for your help.  I turned off the anti-spoofing on the WLAN
interface and it worked like a charm.

Chris, can you elaborate on the potential problems associated with turning
that off?

Thanks again!

Geoff.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Pesek
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 8:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FW-1] Using Office Mode from behind additional firewall
interface = Tunnel Test failed (-121).


Hi Chris and Geoff,

We did exactly the same thing on R55, had exactly the same issue, and ended
up "fixing" it by turning off anti-spoofing on the WLAN interface as well.
We had a case open with Check Point but never really did resolve it.

Ray

>From: Chris Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [FW-1] Using Office Mode from behind additional firewall
>interface = Tunnel Test failed (-121).
>Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:31:43 -0500
>
>We just recently did this. We ran into the same problem, and it came
>down to address spoofing. I don't remember all the specifics, but when
>using office mode, the client uses the office mode IP address for all
>packets. The WLAN interfaces topology is probably set to some other
>address scheme that does not include this, and therefore it is going to
>drop it. Unfortunately, if you setup the topology to include the office
>mode subnet, the external interface may begin to drop traffic because
>they expect traffic originating from that subnet. I think all we have
>done to this point is disable anti-spoofing on the WLAN interface. This
>does pose potential problems, so be careful.
>
>We have not had the time to really sit down and figure out how to
>implement this with anti-spoofing enabled on that interface, so if
>anyone has any suggestions, it would be appreciated.
>
>Regards,
>
>Chris
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff
>Brisbine
>Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 3:25 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [FW-1] Using Office Mode from behind additional firewall
>interface = Tunnel Test failed (-121).
>
>Greetings, all.
>
>It's my first post to this list, so please bear with me.
>
>We are implementing a WLAN here.  The WLAN is sitting on it's own
>interface on our R55 SecurePlatform box.  Due to the 3-5 minute lag of
>being able to ping via WINS name (whether on the WLAN or from home) I
>decided to use Office Mode.  Most of the WLAN users will also be VPNing
>in from home via SecureClient.
>
>When I connect up with SecureClient R55 it tells me Tunnel Test failed
>(-121).  When I connect up with SecureClient R56 it tells me that it
>connected successfully, but it exhibits the identical symptoms to R55.
>The symptom is that I am unable to hit anything on the trusted side of
>our firewall.
>
>I researched the Tunnel Test Failed message and followed the step in
>sk10980 but I still got the Tunnel Test failed.  I also set the Office
>Mode to "Support connectivity enhancement for gateways with multiple
>external interfaces" without any luck.  Has anyone gotten Office Mode
>to work from a separate interface of the firewall (not external)?
>
>I would be happy to provide any additional information or logs.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Geoff Brisbine | Network Administrator
>
>MI-Assistant - A Division of Fiserv FSC, Inc.
>26550 West Mondovi Street | Eleva, WI  54738
>Phone: 715.287.4262 | Fax: 715.287.4576

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================

Reply via email to