The Catalyst 2970 most likely will work, however you may need to upgrade to 
the Enhanced IOS image to support static MAC entries for multicast 
addresses. As for the cheap switches, I'm not sure. It depends on a couple 
of things:
 1. If they recognise multicast MAC addresses (They all start with 01-00-5e)
2. What they do with them!
 If the switch doesn't recognise or care about multicast MAC addresses, it 
may bind the MAC to one port and one port only, effectively breaking load 
balancing. If the switch *does* know about multicast MAC addresses, the only 
way it would work is if it treated those in the same way it treats the 
broadcast MAC address (ff-ff-ff-ff-ff), and forwards these to every switch 
port. Of course, this effectively makes the switch a hub, which you probably 
don't really want.
 Personally, I would save the potential disasters and go straight to 
configurable switches such as the Cisco that can be *told* what to do, for 
every firewall interface. Here's a quick summary of everything you will need 
to do to make multicast load-sharing with ClusterXL work:
 On the Switches
--------------------------------
mac address-table static 01:00:5e:xx:xx vlan XX interface fa1/0/XX fa1/0/XX 
(this lists both the ports that the firewall connects to)
 On any routers which the firewalls talk to:
-------------------------------------------------------------
arp <Firewall Load Balanced IP Address> <Multicast MAC Address> arpa
 Do *not* stuff up the ARP address on the routers. I have been there, twice, 
at 2am for a big customer and the bizarre things that happen will blow your 
mind. None of these bizarre things point to you having stuffed the ARP entry 
on the router either, so you can chase your tail for days.
 Have fun,
 Ed Luck, GCFW (Hons)
Senior Security Engineer
Dimension Data Australia
 

 On 9/14/05, Meyers, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> 
> I am in the throes of setting up ClusterXL on two SecurePlatform boxes. I 
> went looking for a list of switches at Checkpoint's support site that will 
> support load sharing multicast mode - but that requires a support contract 
> :-(
> 
> Can anyone tell me if a Cisco Cat 2970 will work? I suspect it will, but 
> no harm in checking...
> 
> Also, will multicast mode work with somenthing like a Linksys SD208 or 
> Netgear FS608 (for the insecure side of the cluster)? The router to the 'net 
> is a Cisco 1841. Is this OK?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Duncan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =================================================
>

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================

Reply via email to