I am using "public" IP addresses internally (not 10net or 192.168net), but a range of addresses that someone else owns. (They were assigned to us by a former parent company, and although they are "public", were never used "publicly".) My Checkpoint firewall NAT's anything that needs to go out to the internet, and "encryption domains" on the VPN gateways tunnel the traffic that goes to our new parent company as we do hit services on a few of their systems. (They don't access anything on our end.) I don't see this as being any different than using 10net or 192.168net addressing.
It has been setup this way and working for years... Now, the CIO of the new parent company is insisting we change our internal IP addressing as he is not "comfortable" using someone else's IP addresses, and has deemed my configuration "unacceptable". Am I missing something? Does he have a point? - jason ================================================= To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the BODY of the email add: set fw-1-mailinglist nomail ================================================= To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================= If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] =================================================
